Clinical Decision Making by Emergency Room Physicians and Residents
نویسندگان
چکیده
IntroductIon Clinical decision-making is a complex process that is reliant on accurate and timely information. Clinicians are dependent (or should be dependent) on massive amounts of information and knowledge to make decisions that are in the best interest of the patient. Increasingly, information technology (IT) solutions are being used as a knowledge transfer mechanism to ensure that clinicians have access to appropriate knowledge sources to support and facilitate medical decision-making. One particular class of IT in which the medical community is showing increased interest is clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). CDSS is " any program designed to help health-care professionals make clinical decisions " (Musen, Shahar & Shortliffe, 2001). Decision models used in CDSS, especially those providing patient management and diagnostic advice, are normally based on expert knowledge, either discovered from past data or elicited from medical books or practice guidelines. The quality of any patient-specific CDSS is reliant on the quality of the underlying decision model(s). These models have to reflect clinical expertise, which implies that clini-cians using such systems have to provide values for the CDSS input variables that can be correctly elicited only with an appropriate level of expertise. That is, only experienced clinicians will be able to provide CDSS input variables in a reliable and comprehensive manner, while inexperienced clinicians will be forced to gather information and make assessments for activities that they may lack the clinical acumen to do accurately. This may diminish the usefulness of the CDSS and the validity of the advice generated by the system, and lead to the rejection of the system by novice clinicians as forcing them to evaluate a patient in a way in which they are not accustomed. CDSS users can be categorized using the classical taxonomy of novice or expert decision-makers. Differences between these two classes of decision-makers have been widely documented in the decision-making and medical literature. In complex domains such as medicine, it typically takes 10 years of training before one can be considered an expert (Prietula & Simon, 1989). Over time, experts develop a capability to systematize information and to form complex networks of knowledge that is stored in long-term memory (Arocha, Wang & Patel, 2005; Prietula & Simon, 1989). Novices lack these knowledge networks, and thus, when faced with new informational cues, they need to produce more hypotheses than experts (Kushniruk, 2001) and are unable to filter out irrelevant cues (Patel, Arocha & …
منابع مشابه
Decision Making by Emergency Room Physicians and Residents: Implications for the Design of Clinical Decision Support Systems
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are typically constructed from expert knowledge and are often reliant on inputs that are difficult to obtain and on tacit knowledge that only experienced clinicians possess. Research described in this article uses empirical results from a clinical trial of a CDSS with a decision model based on expert knowledge to show that there are differences in how cl...
متن کاملComparison of residents’ approaches to clinical decisions before and after the implementation of Evidence Based Medicine course
Introduction: It has been found that the decision-making process in medicine is affected, to a large extent, by one’s experience, individual mentality, previous models, and common habitual approaches, in addition to scientific principles. Evidence-based medicine is an approach attempting to reinforce scientific, systematic and critical thinking in physicians and provide the ground for optimal d...
متن کاملComparing the Effect of Concept Mapping to Clinical Simulation on Emergency Medical Students` Clinical Decision Making
Introduction: Application of appropriate teaching techniques can increase decision-making skills in emergency settings. Considering the importance of decision-making for rescuers in prevention of deteriorating problems and maintaining patient’s safety in the first level of care, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of two educational methods (concept mapping and clinical simulation) ...
متن کاملCore components of clinical education: a qualitative study with attending physicians and their residents
Introduction: In medical education, particularly in residencycourses, most of the training occurs in real clinical environments.Workplace-based learning profoundly affects students’ knowledge,attitudes, and practice; therefore, it should be properly planned.Due to the extensiveness of the clinical environment and itsimportance in training residents, investigating how residentslearn in these env...
متن کاملIdentifying the effective factors in using medical evidence in clinical medicine: A qualitative study in the emergency department
Introduction: Evidence-based medicine can increase the clinical performance of physicians. This qualitative study was conducted with the aim of examining the effective factors for using new evidence by emergency medicine residents in Rasoul Akram and Haftam Tir Hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Methods: The present descriptive-analytical study was conducted in the year 2016 in two hospitals In Tehran...
متن کامل